PJM6135 Discussion 6 And 5
Please write a primary post for each topic ASAP. 2-3 paragraph with 1 reference,
Will post examples later for the secondary reply once they are finished.
PJM6135 81599 Project Quality Management
Topic for primary post.
1. Open this folder to view and participate in this week’s discussion.
3. What lessons have you learned or new insights do you have from your experience in this quality management class that could benefit you or others in your workplace? If you do not have work experience, you can envision a future employer or work environment.
4. What insights do you have to make quality management become a routine within your organization or your future organization?
5. You may earn up to 10 points for your participation in this forum.
Open this folder to view and participate in this week’s discussion.
What is the role of SPC in quality improvement? Can quality improvement efforts be successful without statistical process control? Why or why not? Please support your arguments with examples and cite properly your sources.
Provide adequate support for your postings and properly cite your sources Refer to the syllabus for grading information. Discussions are graded for writing skills (clarity, style, and grammatical structure, accuracy, quality and completeness).
Reminder: A high quality post is one that explicitly links your personal opinion or experience with the course materials or other relevant outside sources using proper APA format. Both in-text citations and a reference list are required for this discussion. You may earn up to 10 points.
Post at least one primary response no later than Thursday at 11:59 pm Boston time to allow other student’s time to respond to your post.
All secondary posts should be completed by Sunday at 8:00pm.
Discussion postings should be approximately 150-300 words. Communicate in complete sentences, concise, focused paragraphs, and precise language. Excessively wordy postings are not an advantage, but overly brief postings have little to contribute to the discussion. Provide adequate support for your postings; simply agree or disagree with your colleague is not appropriate.