# Do The Following 3 Things To A Proof For The Following Argument Assign P Q And R

Do the following 3 things to a Proof for the

following argument:

#### How many pages is this assigment?

1. Assign P, Q, and R to the atomic sentences in the

order of appearance in the argument.

2. Formalize the argument.

3. Derive the conclusion from the premises by

using the rules of inference.

P1: If things are caused to exist,

then the infinite regress of existence is not possible.

P2: God is not the ultimate cause of existence,

only if the infinite regress of existence is possible.

P3: By the way, things are caused to exist.

C:  Therefore, God is the ultimate cause of existence.

——————————————————

[31-2]  “Derive” the conclusion (C) from the 3 premises

(1 to 3) in a formalized argument below by

employing rules of inference (i.e., proof, where

you need to come up with additional steps beyond

3 below to lead you to the conclusion):

C. ~T

—————————–

1. (R V S) -> (T -> K)

2. ~K

3. R V S

—————————–

[33-1]  Come up with an instance of argument that conforms to HS.

————————————————————-

[33-2]  Derive the conclusion from the given premises in

the argument below by utilizing the rules of

inference (hint: use HS, MT, DS, or some other

combination, as an alternative is available

here).

C:  B

——————-

1:  A V B

2:  C -> D

3:  A -> C

4: ~D

# Do The Following 3 Things To A Proof For The Following Argument Assign P Q And R

Do the following 3 things to a Proof for the

following argument:

#### How many pages is this assigment?

1. Assign P, Q, and R to the atomic sentences in the

order of appearance in the argument.

2. Formalize the argument.

3. Derive the conclusion from the premises by

using the rules of inference.

P1: If things are caused to exist,

then the infinite regress of existence is not possible.

P2: God is not the ultimate cause of existence,

only if the infinite regress of existence is possible.

P3: By the way, things are caused to exist.

C:  Therefore, God is the ultimate cause of existence.

——————————————————

[31-2]  “Derive” the conclusion (C) from the 3 premises

(1 to 3) in a formalized argument below by

employing rules of inference (i.e., proof, where

you need to come up with additional steps beyond

3 below to lead you to the conclusion):

C. ~T

—————————–

1. (R V S) -> (T -> K)

2. ~K

3. R V S

—————————–

[33-1]  Come up with an instance of argument that conforms to HS.

————————————————————-

[33-2]  Derive the conclusion from the given premises in

the argument below by utilizing the rules of

inference (hint: use HS, MT, DS, or some other

combination, as an alternative is available

here).

C:  B

——————-

1:  A V B

2:  C -> D

3:  A -> C

4: ~D